![]() Interesting things do happen outside of peer-reviewed journals as well. I also use it to subscribe to blogs or interesting YouTube channels. Published articles are at least 6 months to (a) year(s) old, but still, better than nothing. I use RSS feeds offered by many journals to stay informed about the articles they publish. Staying informed on current research (green).But still, let’s go through the workflow in detail here: There are a few minor differences to the workflow depicted here over a year ago. Meaning I’m on to something that works for me long-term. And I’m happy to report that my workflow is more or less stable over time. Personally, I know that there are things I could optimize in my workflow, but in doing so, I would have to concentrate all my time and energy on optimizing that workflow, and not on doing any work. Times change and nothing is perfect forever, so why invest almost unlimited amounts of work to get to a very time-limited almost perfect solution? So, I think it’s best to have something rugged, something that works good enough - and screw perfection. It can really take the drive out of any creative endeavor. And if you get really close to perfection the discontent with this almost perfect solution skyrockets. You have a work flow that is almost perfect. I really think there is something of a valley of “almost-perfect-absolute-discontent” in work flows. Using more and more features for ever more intricate purposes, before switching to another solution altogether, because some “tiny but crucial function” was not possible in the old workflow. One of the great risks when you start to deliberately attempt to improve your workflow is that doing so becomes a goal in itself. They must often change, who would be constant in happiness or wisdom.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |